"KESULITAN TESIS ANDA adalah INSPIRASI KAMI"

Rabu, 31 Juli 2013

Tesis: IMPROVING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION USING COMBINATION OF PICTURE AND READING MATERIALS



ABSTRACT
 IMPROVING STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION USING COMBINATION OF PICTURE AND READING MATERIALS (An Action Research on the Second Grade Students of SMP xxxxx  Academic Year 2010 / 2011). Thesis. English Department of Graduate Program, . 2011

 The students’ problem was lack of reading comprehension. It is caused by the lack of reading English texts and less motivation of reading. The research is carried out to arouse the students’ motivation to read, in this case, reading English texts. Hopefully, they can improve their reading comprehension.   
The data were collected through observation, interview and documentation. The qualitative data were collected through the students’ participation in reading class. The observation is on the students’ ability to do the exercises, join the group discussion and doing the tests. The data were supported by the informal interview after the reading class has been finished. It is carried out to find out the students’ problems during the use of pictures and reading materials in the reading class. The quantitative data were obtained through the result of exercises and the post-test.
The findings show that the use of pictures and reading materials in readiing class gives some positive aspects. The first effect is on the students’ affective factors such as motivation and self confident. The second effect is the change of the students’ attitude toward the teaching learning process. The third effect is on the active participation during the reading class. The last but not the least is the improvement on reading comprehension, especially the reading score.
The research finding implies that the use of pictures and reading materials can be an alternative technique to promote the students’ reading comprehension. Therefore, it is recommended that the English teachers apply it. It is also recommended that the institution socialize the findings since it is useful for English subject. The last is for the other researcher to develop the aspect of writing skill which has not been developed in the research.

Keywords: improving, reading comprehension, picture, reading materials

Jurnal: Effectiveness of Blogging to Practice Reading at a Freshman EFL Program

Bertha Leiva de Izquierdo
Universidad Simón Bolívar

Leticia Esteves Reyes
Universidad Simón Bolívar

ABSTRACT
The main objective of this action research is to explore the effectiveness of blogs to promote frequent extra reading practice in a freshman EFL science and technology reading program at a public university. Sociocultural theory and the revival of Vygostky’s constructivism have made us rethink how to approach the learning-teaching process in the twenty-first century. Are we really helping our students acquire skills that will be crucial in their future? Are we using learning resources that will make them connect socioculturally and learn from the interactions among themselves and others? Many of the low proficiency students in this program do not have regular access to a computer and have not worked with blogs before. There is not only a perceived socioeconomic divide but differences in skills and knowledge about computers are also quite noticeable. The materials and activities of three class blogs used during the 2007-2008 academic year will be presented, as well as the interactions that went on among students. Results show that these online social environments are very well perceived by most students and that they are quite effective when new ways of learning outside the traditional classroom are explored.

INTRODUCTION
The use of technology in language teaching and learning has been around for many years. Language labs, tape recorders, overhead projectors, TV sets and videos date from the 60‘s and 70‘s. Computer Assisted Language Learning (CALL) appeared on the scene in the early 80‘s with the use of computer programs while the integration of Information and Communications Technology (ICT) came to be known in the 90‘s moving ahead from static language programs to the dynamic World Wide Web and the so-called web-based tools. Nowadays with the tools of the Web 2.0 geared toward individuals and groups, educational institutions, universities specifically, have to take advantage of the easy to handle and high potential of these technologies which seem to fit perfectly in project collaboration and group learning (Swain, 2008).
Undoubtedly, the use of ICTs has become increasingly important in our classrooms as part of the English Language Teaching practice (ELT), as well as in our students‘ and our own lives. Why is that? How many of us start our daily routine by checking email accounts or reading on-line newspapers? How many people use different search engines like www.google.com, www.altavista.com, and www.yahoo.com on a daily basis? How many people use Yahoo or Hotmail Messenger and Skype to communicate live with coworkers, friends, relatives, students, and even unknown people via the web? How many of us have joined online social networks such as Facebook, Bebo, Flixter, hi5 or Ning to create communities of people who share interests and activities or to bring together groups of people who are fascinated by exploring other people‘s interests and activities?
Apart from the widespread use of the Internet and its applications, the number of hours students spend on line daily and their abilities to multi-task cannot go unnoticed. Their common practice and sometimes obsessive use of video games off and on-line is striking; and the gap between those who have access to technology and those who do not is much wider day by day. There is an increasingly marked socio-economical difference between people who use computers and those who do not— a phenomenon experts in the area refer to as ―digital divide.‖ According to Lu (2001) ―there are great disparities in opportunity to access the Internet and the information and educational/business opportunities tied to this access between developed and developing countries‖ (p. 1). In this observable fact, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer, at least with regard to technology, as the gap between the two widens. The idea originally came about when comparisons were made in Internet access between rural and urban areas of the U.S. (Bouza, 2003; Bucy, 2000; Robinson & Nie, 2003)
There are manifold answers to the question of why the Internet plays an important role in our daily routines, and more importantly in this article, the reasons why ICTs have gained importance in the practice of ELT. Some of these reasons have been discussed by Dudeney and Hockly (2007). First, it is a fact that Internet access and broadband are becoming cheaper and more widely available by means of cable, satellite or wireless connections either at home, at work, at educational institutions or at cyber cafes. Second, since we live in the age of computers, many young learners are being born and are growing up with technology as a natural and integrated part of their lives. Third, as an international language, English is being used in contexts mediated by technology, especially the Internet, as it provides us teachers with new opportunities for authentic tasks as well as a wide range of ready-made ELT materials. Many textbooks and teacher resources come with additional materials that encourage the use of technology in the classroom either by incorporating interactive CD ROMS or by providing links to various websites where students can reinforce their L2 skills even outside the classroom without necessarily having to abandon the learning environment. All of these ideas have come up from the fact that ―by providing digital students with opportunities to learn in ways that satisfy their needs, they will become more engaged in the learning process and in realizing their potential‖ (Bedenbaugh, 2006).
With the presence of the Internet and computers almost everywhere and in many learning environments, it is hard to believe that there are still people and professionals from different fields, teachers included, who are afraid of using technology. These people are called ―technophobes‖ while the term ―dot com generation‖ has been coined for those who have grown up using technology and who feel at ease and very confident in front of a computer. As opposed to ―technophobes,‖ technology enthusiasts are known as ―technogeeks.‖ Now, as educators we must ask ourselves: Where do we stand? Where do we belong?
Prensky (2001a, 2001b, 2005) refers to today‘s students as ―digital natives‖ since they have no particular accent when speaking about technology: ―They are fluent in the digital language of computers, video games, and the Internet‖ (Prensky, 2005, p. 8). On the other hand, he also refers to the ―digital immigrants‖ as those who have come to the world of technology a little later: ―We have adopted many aspects of the technology, but just like those who learn another language later in life, we retain an ‗accent‘ because we still have one foot in the past. We will read a manual, for example, to understand a program before we think to let the program teach itself. Our accent from the pre-digital world often makes it difficult for us to effectively communicate with our students‖ (Prensky, 2005, p. 8). In many cases, experienced teachers are categorized as digital immigrants while young learners are considered digital natives. Jukes (2007) from the InfoSavvy Group has pointed out that ―by being DSL - speaking digital as a second language - many of us are distracted and disoriented by the multiple, simultaneous, hyperlinked information sources inherent to the new technologies‖ (p. 4). He and McCain (2008) have come to the conclusion that the disconnection between ―digital natives,‖ (today‘s students) and ―digital immigrants,‖ (many adults) results from poor communication. They speculate that most misunderstandings come from the differences between how digital students learn and how non-digital teachers teach. After an extensive research that must be followed by careful reflection, they have listed some differences between digital native learners (DNL) and digital immigrant teachers (DIT). DNLs would rather get information fast from multiple multimedia sources while DITs prefer to get it slowly from limited sources. DNLs prefer parallel processing and multitasking but DITs promote singular processing and single tasking. The first favor processing pictures, sounds and video before text while the second choose text over pictures, sounds and video. DNLs are used to random access to hyperlinked multimedia information but DITs give information in a linear way, logically and sequentially. While DNLs would rather network and interact with many people simultaneously, DITs prefer students to work independently. DNLs want instant rewards but DITs give delayed gratification. Digital native learners prefer learning that is pertinent, immediately useful and enjoyable but digital immigrant teachers prefer to teach to the syllabus and standardized tests.
Similarly, researchers from the Berkman Center for Internet and Society at Harvard Law School and the Research Center for Information Law at the University of St. Gallen in Switzerland, who have been doing research on Digital Natives (DN), claim that not all youth are necessarily DN and that being a DN has more to do with a common global culture, with certain characteristics and experiences related to how they interact with technologies, information, one another and with others. This group of researchers point out that even subjects who were not ‗born digital‘ can be connected and updated as much as the younger crowd, some of whom might not be complete digital natives.
As teachers of the 21st Century, we must visualize the continuum of ―technophobes and technogeeks‖ as well as that of the ―digital natives and the digital immigrants‖ as Dudeney and Hockly (2007) point out, and we must figure out where we stand between these two extremes or if we have stepped on the spaces around as clearly illustrated by Wesley Fryer in Figure 1.1
From the times of Paulo Freire to our days, we have wanted to empower students, give them more freedom and responsibility about their own learning, and provide them with the right environment that would foster sociocultural and collaborative interaction, promote autonomous learning and help them learn to learn. The revival of Vygostky‘s ideas and the advent of constructivism and sociocultural theory have led us to rethink how we approach the teaching-learning process in the 21st Century and what the role of technology in education is. Are we truly helping our students learn and practice key skills that will allow them to successfully carry out successfully their professional, personal and social activities in the near future? Are we really using educational resources that can provide our students with opportunities to connect among themselves socioculturally and learn from the interactions between them and other groups?

Jurnal: English Reading Instruction in Elementary Schools in China Ran Hu East Carolina University

ABSTRACT
The purpose of this descriptive qualitative study is to explore English reading instruction in elementary schools in China under the revised curriculum in 2001. Eleven English teachers in three elementary schools in Beijing participated in this study. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, field observations, and documents. The study reports seven aspects of knowledge that beginning English reading instruction in these schools has covered, including phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, comprehension, grammar, and cultural knowledge, as well as the instructional activities provided by these teachers.

INTRODUCTION
No one can deny the fact that English has become the language of globalization because of its use in social, economic and political fields in many countries. With China‘s entry into the World Trade Organization in 2001 and its hosting of the Olympics in 2008, English has been closely associated with Chinese people‘s daily life. It has become a key to success and to the world outside China. The Ministry of Education (2006) has reported that more than 300 million Chinese people are learning English, and that the total number of English learners in China will surpass the total number of native English speakers in the world in the next few years. The hunger for learning English has made it a required subject in elementary school. In 2001, English became a required subject starting at third grade (MOE, 2001a). The Ministry also suggested that some elementary schools could start English instruction as early as first grade if they had the capacity. The 2001 National English Curriculum Standard (NECS) promoted the idea of developing students‘ comprehensive language abilities through language application (MOE, 2001b). Under this revised curriculum, language skills, including listening, speaking, reading, and writing, should be the foci. However, reading and listening should be emphasized first and foremost because the abilities to read and comprehend assist writing and speaking abilities (Bao, 2004; 2006).
Though it has been seven years since the implementation of the new curriculum, the teaching of English at elementary school is still in the experimental stage. There remain problems associated with this implementation, such as the insufficiently developed curriculum to include English as a required subject in elementary schools and the shortage of qualified teachers and resources (Bao, 2004, 2006; Cui, 2002). Given the current situation, the purpose of this descriptive study is to reveal what and how English reading is taught in elementary schools in Beijing China. Three elementary schools in Beijing were selected based on the convenience sampling method and 11 English teachers in these schools participated in the study. What aspects of English reading are taught in elementary schools in Beijing China and how they are taught? comprises the study‘s major research question.

WHY FOCUS ON READING?
The term Reading has different definitions in different times and under different contexts. In the United States, where English is the native language, three definitions of reading were identified and have influenced the literacy programs for years (Foertsch, 1998). The first definition stated that learning to read means learning to pronounce words; the second that learning to read means learning to identify words and get their meaning; and the third that learning to read means learning to bring meaning to a text in order to get meaning from it. Collectively, these three definitions reflected a complete prospective about reading. However, current literacy research suggests a more comprehensive view. The National Reading Panel (2000) reported that phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary and comprehension are the five components to be included in reading instruction. Other research also recognized the importance of skill instruction as one part of the reading process and recommended a balanced reading instruction for all (Allington & Cummingham, 1996; Au, 1993).
In the world of teaching English as a second or foreign language (ESL/EFL), reading as well as listening, speaking and writing have been identified as the four basic skills in language learning. Reading is considered especially valuable under the foreign language context because it is one major source for students to obtain language input (Ediger, 2001). The term reading has also been used to refer to two different processes: reading aloud from the print and reading for comprehension (Chastain, 1988). While both processes are important for learning to read a foreign language, most reading research to date has focused its attention on reading for comprehension in the Chinese context (Hu, 2007).
The 2001 NECS specified six objectives for reading instruction at elementary schools. It stated that students who complete elementary school should be able to (1) recognize words and phrases that they have learned (); (2) read easy words based on spelling rules (, ); (3) read and understand easy directions on the textbooks (); (4) read and understand the simple information on greeting cards (); (5) read and understand easy stories and essays with the help of illustrations and form the habit of reading based on semantic chunking (, ); and (6) read aloud stories and essays with fluency and accuracy () (MOE, 2001b, p. 11). These objectives emphasized both reading out loud and reading for meaning. Therefore, instructions should be provided to meet these goals.

Tesis: PENGELOLAAN PENDIDIKAN OLAHRAGA PERMAINAN BOLA VOLI YANG PRESTATIF



ABSTRAK

PENGELOLAAN PENDIDIKAN OLAHRAGA PERMAINAN BOLA VOLI YANG PRESTATIF. Tesis. Program Studi Manajemen Pendidikan Program Pascasarjana Universitas xxxx

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk: (1) Mendeskripsikan karakteristik perencanaan pendidikan olahraga bola voli prestatif di SMP xxx, (2) Mendeskripsikan karakteristik pelaksanaan dan pengembangan olahraga bola voli prestatif di SMP xxxx sebagai kegiatan ekstra kurikuler. (3) Mendeskripsikan karakteristik evaluasi olahraga bola voli prestatif di SMP xxxx. Jenis penelitian ini adalah penelitian kualitatif, dan desain penelitian ini adalah desain penelitian deskriptif kualitatif. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah menggunakan metode observasi, metode wawancara, dan metode dokumentasi dalam mengumpulkan data serta informasi guna mendukung jalannya proses penelitian. Sumber data dari penelitian ini adalah siswa / atlit bola voli SMP xxxx, pelatih, dan guru olahraga di SMP xxxx. Data divalidasi dengan menggunakan trianggulasi data.
Hasil penelitian adalah : 1) Perencanaan pendidikan olahraga bola voli prestatif di SMP xxxx dilakukan dengan matang. Setiap pelatih pada pendidikan olahraga bola voli di SMP xxxx harus mengetahui unsur-unsur perencanaan pelatihan yang baik, antara lain: mengidentifikasi kebutuhan siswa, tujuan yang hendak dicapai, berbagai target dan strategi latihan yang relevan digunakan untuk mencapai tujuan dan evaluasi. Dalam merencanakan pendidikan olahraga bola voli di SMP xxxx, pelatih menyusun program latihan, menentukan target latihan, membentuk kelompok-kelompok latihan berdasarkan jenis kelamin dan usia atau kelas. 2) Pelaksanaan dan pengembangan olahraga bola voli sebagai kegiatan ekstra kurikuler di SMP xxxx ditunjang dengan adanya faktor-faktor yaitu; materi pelatihan yang jelas dan terarah, strategi dan program pelatihan yang teratur, terarah, dan menyesuaikan panduan dan target pelatihan, interaksi pelatih dan siswa yang baik, pelatih yang kompeten dan siswa yang memiliki motivasi tinggi.  3) Evaluasi sangat diperlukan untuk mengetahui perkembangan kemampuan siswa / atlit secara psikomotorik, afektif, maupun kognitif. Kemudian pelatih akan memberitahu siswa / atlit letak kemampuan mereka terhadap grafik kemampuan fisik, dan memberikan arahan dan bimbingan agar kemampuan siswa dapat lebih meningkat lagi. Evaluasi teknik meliputi teknik meningkatkan kemampuan fisik dan teknik permainan bola voli.
.

Kata Kunci: pengelolaan, pendidikan olahraga, permainan bola voli prestatif

Selasa, 30 Juli 2013

Tesis: THE SISTEMATICITY OF INTERLANGUAGE OF THE SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS SMK xxx

CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
A. Background of the Research     
Learning a second language is a lifelong process and it is a challenging experience for second language learners. English has become international language and it is used as the language in international relations, and in exchanging knowledge and technology. English occupies the status of a second language in Indonesian education system in both primary and secondary school. It is taught as a compulsory subject in junior high school (SMP) and senior high school (SMA), even it has been tried to be taught to the students in some elementary schools.
Teaching English in Indonesia is focused on the students’ communicative competence. The communication can be oral and written forms. The learners should be capable of using the four language skills, namely: listening, speaking, reading, and writing (National Department of Education, 2004: 6). Hymes stated that communicative competence is what a speaker needs to know in order to be communicatively competence in a speech community. In order to gain communicative competence, a student has to acquire not only knowledge but also ability of language use (Hymes in Richards et.al, 1986: 68). The learners should have abilities in reading and listening to support their speaking and writing.
Celce-Murcia represented the model of communicative competence (Murcia in Curriculum 2004). In her model, Murcia developed the competencies in order that the students can achieve communicative competence. The core of communicative competence is discourse competence. Discourse competence is the ability to understand and create forms of the language that are longer than sentences, such as stories, conversations, or business letters. Discourse competence concerns with selection, sequencing, and arrangement of words, structures, sentences and utterances to achieve a unified spoken or written text. It includes understanding how particular instances of language use are internally constructed. (Murcia in Curriculum 2004) Meanwhile, the students are able to acquire discourse competence only if they can gain the supported competencies namely linguistic competence, actional competence, sociocultural competence and strategic competence. Linguistic competence deals with sentence pattern and types, constituent structure, morphological inflection, lexical resources, and phonological systems needed to realize communication such as spoken and written. The actional competence relates with oral communication. It can be applied by the teacher in class in order that the students are familiar with English discourse. The sociocultural competence concerns with how to express message in the socio and cultural context. It is very important in learning second language because the students can not find the social and cultural context by themselves. The teacher needs to create a part or the entire language environment. (Brown, 2000: 7). Brown (2000: 7) stated that “Teaching is guiding and facilitating learning, enabling the learner to learn, setting the condition for learning”. The students learn to express, to interpret, and to negotiate meaning according to culturally-derived norms and expectations. Thus, the three components are accommodated with strategic competence. It is used to break down the problem and difficulties encounter in communication.  
Canale (1983) oulines four major components of communicative competence: grammatical competence, including knowledge of vocabulary, rules of words and sentence formation, linguistic semantics, pronunciation and spelling; sociolinguistic competence, including rules of appropriateness of both meanings (allowable messages) and grammatical forms in different sociolinguistic contexts; discourse competence, the knowledge required to combine forms and meanings to achieve unified spoken and written texts; and strategic competence, knowledge of verbal and and non-verbal communication strategies that may be called upon to compensate for limitations in one or more of the other areas of communicative competence (www. Wikipedia.com).
Writing is one of the important skills in teaching English. It has always occupied a place in most English language course. One of the reasons is that more and more people can explain how people perform different processes in a sequence of steps. To write well, people must have good capabilities in writing. Moreover, someone who wants to write a text s/he should know the steps in writing process and aspects of writing. The writer must be able to organize the idea, to construct a sentences, to use punctuation and spelling well. Besides, they must be able to arrange their writing into cohesive and coherent paragraphs and texts. Byrne (1997: 1) defines “Writing is producing sequence of sentences arranged in a particular order and linked together in certain ways”. In reality, people always communicate to each other. They do not only communicate with spoken language but also communicate in written language. It is one of the reasons why the people need to master writing-skill well.
Basically, in writing, learners are not only realizing information message or idea in a sentence in correct grammatical but also they must be packed in text formulation that conventionally have been agreed by the society. So that, the reader or audience will more easily understand the content in the texts. As for the criterion is; (1) purpose, (2) rhetorical structure, (3) linguistic realization or grammatical pattern (Pardiyono, 2007: 2). In other word, as consideration of the effectiveness of using language, each written text should include these.
Mastering writing skill is not easy. Problem may rise during studying writing. Trible (1996) says that learning writing skill is difficult. His statement is as follows,; “Learning to write in either a first or second language is one of the most difficult tasks a learner encounters. Many native speakers leave school with a poor command of writing. Learning to write is a difficult and lengthy process. One of that is induces anxiety and frustration in many learners. Learning to write is not just a question on developing a set of mechanical “orthographic skill”. It also involves learning a new set of cognitive and social relation.” (Tribble in Qatawech, 2009: Unplubished Journal).
When someone learns a foreign language, he often faces interference, where he/ she applies his/her mother tongue or first language structure to structure of the foreign language which is different from his/ her native language. Indonesian students learn English as the first foreign language. Therefore, English is a new language so that they get some difficulties and they also need much time to learn. Competence based curriculum 2004 claims, “………………. when one learns a foreign language, he is involved in creating and interpreting various kinds of texts made form the foreign culture which are different from his own.” Thus, kinds of texts which are colored by various communicative objectives, arrangement of parts of the text, and certain linguistics features should be noticed by every language learners. It means that the learners can not only create English sentences in isolation, but also arrange them to become texts that are accepted by the native speakers.
Moreover, Fauziati (2001) says that most of learning problems are caused by different elements found between the two languages. Therefore, he will be able to learn the elements of the target language which are similar to those with his own more easily than those which are not found in his native language. On the other hand, it is difficult for Indonesian to use correct structure in English. This is mostly because the students are influenced by their mother tongue on the acquisition of the new structure. However, the students are still weak in English, especially in their writing skill. They still seem to commit errors in all aspect of language. According to James (1998) in Saadiyah Darus, errors in writing such as tenses, prepositions and weak vocabulary are the most common and frequent type of errors that are committed by learners. The learners usually face difficulties in learning the grammatical aspects of the Target Language, such as in subject-verb agreement, the use of preposition, articles and the use of correct tense. Such errors can be seen clearly in the learners’ written performance (Nik Safiah (1978) in Darus 2009). The problems that the students are bound to encounter would be weak vocabulary, inappropriate use of grammar in sentence etc. teachers who can analyze and treat errors effectively would be more able to help their students to become more corrective techniques can give effective learning and teaching of English. In fact, making mistakes is a natural process of learning and must be considered as part of learning. As a result, errors must be viewed positively. Therefore, EA is the best tool for describing and explaining errors made by speakers of other languages. By investigating students’ written work, it will provide a means to help the teachers to recognize the importance of errors as one of the challenging areas in teaching English.
Interlanguage is a study on the language of the second language learners, which currently receives a wider acceptance in the literature of Error Analysis (Fauziati, 2009: 155). The notion ‘interlanguage’ means to “a language between two (or more) languages, i.e. a target language (Lt) norm which a student is trying to achieve, and his first language (L1). The interlanguage has charactheristics of both of these languages” (Ro, 2009). The recognition as systematic rules also comes from Smith (1994). He defines interlanguage as “the systematic linguistic behavior of learners of a second or other language; in other words; learners of non-native languages” (Smith, 1994: 7).
Due to the intricacy of writing, it is understandable that students usually fins difficulty in writing tasks. Commonly, they are afraid of making mistakes and worry about their ability in reproducing and arranging words of making mistakes and worry about their ability in reproducing in writing tasks, they do not want to try and even they do not like writing. It is teachers’ task to create an exciting and conducive writing class as well as to give continuous guidance to students. Teachers should try to explore new productive strategies in brightening the writing class. It is really a hand job, but students should be given a strong foundation for their writing skill before entering the higher level of education.  
Writing a short text will make students really enjoy the writing class. As learners know more about the language, many errors will disappear. Not only do the they replace one tense with the other tense(s), but also they fail to construct the correct verb forms for these tenses, for examples:
·     My former teacher was Mrs. Esti. I study with her for two year.
·     My teacher in class X was Mrs. Esti. I studyed with her during two years.
·     I have visit Borobudur many times, so I can tell you how it is like.
These errors were caused by the difference between the rules of the language used by the students (Indonesian) and the rules of target language. Although the writer admits that students, in their process of learning, usually cannot prevent themselves from making errors, she still thinks the errors made by the students need remedial work or otherwise they will remain errors.
Related to the phenomenon above, in this research the writer would like to conduct a research about "THE SISTEMATICITY OF INTERLANGUAGE OF THE SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS".
B.     Formulation of the Problem
Based on this problem, the problem is formulated as what is the writer rises some subsidiary research questions as follows;
1.      What is the linguistic system used by the students to express past events?
2.      What is the linguistic system used by the students to express future events? 
3.      What is the linguistic system used by the students to express present  events?
4.      What is the linguistic system used by the students to express negation.
C.    The Objectives of the Study
In relation to the background of the study and the problem formulation, there are some objectives that are expected to be achieved in this study. The objectives are as follows:
1.      to describe what the linguistic system used by the students to express past events is
2.      to describe what the linguistic system used by the students to express future events is
3.      to describe what the linguistic system used by the students to express present events is
4.      to describe what the linguistic system used by the students to express negation is
D. Limitation of the Study
Problem limitation is made in order to avoid misunderstanding and misinterpretation. It also hopefully can give a limitation toward the given analysis. The writer only focuses the study on the errors in English writing of class XI Accounting 1 students at SMK xxx, so that the study in writing texts will be improved.
In order the study can be deeply examined, the writer needs to limit the study as follows:
1. The  subjects of the study is limited to the secondary students of eleventh grade at SMK xxx  in the Academic Year 2010/2011. There were 34 female students in the class.
2.  The objects of the study is limited on the sistematicity of interlanguage and error analysis in English writing of class XI Accounting 1 students of SMK xxx.
E. The Benefits of the Study
Herewith, the author expects that this research would give several benefits, both theoretically and practically.
1. Theoretical Benefit
The finding of the research will be useful as a reference and comparison for the future research. This research is dealing with the sistematicity of interlanguage of the secondary school students in SMK xxx. 
2.  Practically Benefits
a.  For the teachers
1)      By reading the result of this study, they can get clear description about the common errors made by the students so they find new methods to anticipate the making of errors and to improve their teaching ability in English class especially in teaching writing.
2)      By investigating the students’ errors in their written works, it will provide help to the teachers to learn something about the effectiveness in their teaching English.
3)      The teachers also get clear explanation about the learning strategies that the students employ to master English.
b. For the readers: the study can serve as a reference for those who want to conduct a research dealing with error analysis and interlanguage.

Tesis: IMPROVING STUDENTS’ ENGLISH SPEAKING COMPETENCE THROUGH THINK-PAIR-SHARE STRATEGY (A Classroom Action Research on the Seventh Grade Students of SMP Negeri 1 xxxxxx Academic Year 2010/2011)

ABSTRACT
IMPROVING STUDENTS’ ENGLISH SPEAKING COMPETENCE THROUGH THINK-PAIR-SHARE STRATEGY (A Classroom Action Research on the Seventh Grade Students of SMP Negeri 1 xxx Academic Year 2010/2011). Thesis. 2011.
The problem of seventh grade students in SMPN 1 xxx was lack of speaking competence. It was caused by the lack of English speaking practice and less motivation of speaking. The objectives of the research were: 1) to find out whether the use of Think-Pair-Share in teaching English improve the students’ English speaking competence at the seventh grade in SMPN 1 xxx, 2) to find out the effectiveness of using Think-Pair-Share in teaching English speaking, and     3) to find out the problems that may appear during the application of Think-Pair-Share in speaking class.
The data were collected through observation and tests. They were collected through the students’ participation in speaking class. The observation was done in the students’ ability to do the exercises, join the group discussion and presentation. The data were supported by the informal interview after speaking class had finished.
The findings show that: 1) the use of TPS in speaking class can improve the students’ English speaking competence at the seventh grade in SMPN 1 xxx. 2) The use of TPS is effective in teaching speaking in terms of improving the students’ affective factors such as motivation and self confidence, arousing the students’ active participation during the speaking class, improving the students’ speaking competence, especially the speaking score. 3) The problems appeared during the application of TPS were a few students who still passive in speaking and those who still did not fulfill the Minimum Passing Grade or Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal (KKM).
The research findings implied that TPS can be an alternative strategy to promote the students’ speaking competence. Therefore, it is recommended that the English teacher apply it. It is also recommended that the institution socialize the findings since it is useful for English subject. The last is for other researchers to develop the aspect of speaking competence which has not been developed in the research.
Keywords: improving, speaking competence, Think-Pair-Share strategy

Tesis: Pendekatan Quantum Teaching Dengan Alat Peraga Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika Materi Bangun Ruang Siswa Kelas VIII-A Semester 2 SMP Negeri XXXXX Tahun 2010/2011

ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan prestasi belajar matematika materi bangun ruang melalui metode quantum teaching.
Setting penelitian ini adalah SMP Negeri xxxx. Subjek penelitian adalah siswa kelas VIII-A SMP Negeri xxxxx semester 2 Tahun Pelajaran 2010/2011 yang berjumlah 30 siswa.
Metode penelitian menggunakan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui observasi, dokumentasi, dan tes. Analisis data dilakukan dengan tiga tahapan meliputi: reduksi data, penyajian data dan penarikan kesimpulan atau verifikasi.
Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa berdasarkan data empirik penelitian menyatakan bahwa melalui penggunaan Pendekatan Quantum Teaching dengan alat peraga dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa kelas VIII-A SMP Negeri xxxxxxx Tahun 2010/2011 materi bangun ruang dari kondisi awal rata-rata 49.7 ke kondisi akhir rata-rata 62.3. Ketuntasan juga mengalami peningkatan dari 26.7% pada kondisi awal menjadi 86.7% pada kondisi akhir di siklus II. Jadi didapatkan kesimpulan bahwa melalui pendekatan quantum teaching dengan alat peraga dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar matematika materi bangun ruang siswa kelas VIII-A SMP Negeri xxxxx semester 2 tahun pelajaran 2010/2011.   
Kata kunci: prestasi belajar matematika, quantum teaching, bangun ruang

Sabtu, 27 Juli 2013

Mathematics Teaching Learning - Journal

Overview
This chapter focuses on advances in the study of mathematics teaching and learning since the publication of the first edition of the Handbook of Educational Psychology (Berliner & Calfee, editors) in 1996. Because of the scope of the review, comprehensive coverage is not possible. In what follows I have chosen to focus thematically on major areas in which progress has been made or where issues at the boundaries of theory and practice are controversial. These areas include: research focusing on issues of teacher knowledge and aspects of professional development; issues of curriculum development, implementation, and assessment; issues of equity and diversity; and issues of learning in context(s). The chapter concludes with a discussion of the state of the field and its contextual surround.

Teacher Knowledge
Significant progress has been made over the past decade in understanding mathematics teachers’ knowledge, how it plays out in practice, and how it can be developed. The field can boast of two major books and two additional programmatic bodies of work, all of which add significantly to our understanding. Over the past decade, two major works have emerged that expand the field’s conception of the nature and complexity of the knowledge that teachers bring to the classroom. Liping Ma’s 1999 book Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics demonstrated the unique character of highly accomplished mathematics teachers’ knowledge – a knowledge clearly different from knowledge of the mathematics alone. Magdalene Lampert’s
2001 book Teaching Problems and the Problem of Teaching offers a remarkably detailed empirical and theoretical examination of the multiple levels of knowledge, planning, and decision-making entailed in a year’s teaching. Next, I briefly describe Deborah Ball, Hyman Bass, and their colleagues’ studies of the mathematical knowledge that supports effective teaching, and the work of Miriam Sherin in describing teachers’ professional vision. Like the work described before it, this work sheds light on the character of knowledge that enables teachers to interact effectively with students over substantial mathematics. This work is followed by a description of the work by the Teacher Model Group at Berkeley, which has worked to characterize both the nature of teacher knowledge and the ways that it works in practice. Like the work of Ball, Bass, and colleagues, this work characterizes teaching as problem solving. It contributes to the problem solving and teaching literatures by describing, at a theoretical level of mechanism, the kinds of decision-making in which teachers engage as they work to solve the problems of teaching.

Rabu, 24 Juli 2013

Jasa Training; Bimbingan; Konsultasi dan Pembuatan PTK / PTS Solo dan sekitarnya (Surakarta; Karanganyar; Sukoharjo; Wonogiri; Sragen; Klaten; Boyolali; Purwodadi; Salatiga)

MEDIA ILMIAH - Pusat Olah Data dan Karya Tulis Ilmiah
Pabelan, Kartosuro
0888 2988 781 / 0888 4198 220
a/n : Andi / Lisa
media_ilmiah@ymail.com
Tim Media Ilmiah menawarkan program Training dan Pembuatan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK) / Penelitian Tindakan Kepengawasan / Sekolah (PTS) bagi Anda para guru; Kepala Sekolah dan Pengawas yang kesulitan dalam membuat/menyusun dan melaksanakan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK). Kami tidak sekedar mentraining Anda ataupun membuatkan PTK Anda, namun kami juga membimbing Anda secara teknis dalam pelaksanaannya. Mulai dari membuat Judul; membuat proposal; mencari referensi/literatur; mengenalkan metode pembelajaran terbaru; pelaksanaan tindakan dan penyusunan laporan PTK/PTS.
 
A.     TRAINING/WORKSHOP Penulisan Karya Ilmiah PTK/PTS
1.      Jumlah peserta : 5 – 15 orang/kelas.
2.  Training dilaksanakan 5 pertemuan (90menit/pertemuan) dengan langsung pada teknis pembuatan PTK. Pelaksanaan Training disesuaikan dengan progres pembuatan PTK peserta.
3.      Biaya : Rp 700ribu/pertemuan.
4.      Training dilaksanakan di kelas sekolah yang bersangkutan.
5.  Kelas Training bisa gabungan dari beberapa sekolah dengan lokasi berdekatan, jumlah peserta maksimal 15orang/kelas.
6.      Tahapan Training: JUDUL  + INSTRUMEN PENELITIAN ; PENDAHULUAN; BAB 1; BAB 2; BAB 3; BAB 4; BAB 5; LAMPIRAN KELENGKAPAN.
7.  Pada pertemuan terakhir ditargetkan semua peserta sudah menyelesaikan PTK lengkap dengan Lampiran kelengkapannya.
Training dilaksanakan dengan mengacu pada Buku Pedoman Penilaian Kegiatan PKB – Menilai Karya Ilmiah.


B.      PENYUSUNAN Karya Ilmiah PTK / PTS
Bagi Anda yang benar-benar kesulitan membuat/menyusun PTK/PTS karena kesibukan tugas & kegiatan lain, kami juga bersedia untuk membuat/menyusun PTK/PTS Anda sampai selesai dengan ketentuan:
1.    Data dari Anda guru peneliti.
2.    Biaya  Rp600ribu/PTK, dengan sistem pembayaran:
-  Uang muka = 60%, diserahkan bersamaan dengan data-data penelitian.
-   Pelunasan = 40% saat pengambilan berkas PTK / file PTK dikirim via email.
3.  Fasilitas yang Anda dapatkan : berkas PTK lengkap dengan Lampiran Kelengkapan dan CD berisi file PTK lengkap. Untuk klien Luar Kota & Luar Jawa: softfile dikirim via email.
Dalam menyusun laporan PTK/PTS, kami merujuk pada Buku Pedoman Penilaian Kegiatan PKB – Menilai Karya Ilmiah.
PERCAYAKAN PEMBUATAN KARYA ILMIAH ANDA KEPADA KAMI!!!
MEDIA ILMIAH
Pabelan, Kartosuro (selatan SDN Pabelan 2)
0888 4198 220 / 0888 2988 781