"KESULITAN TESIS ANDA adalah INSPIRASI KAMI"

Selasa, 30 Juli 2013

Tesis: THE SISTEMATICITY OF INTERLANGUAGE OF THE SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS SMK xxx

CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
A. Background of the Research     
Learning a second language is a lifelong process and it is a challenging experience for second language learners. English has become international language and it is used as the language in international relations, and in exchanging knowledge and technology. English occupies the status of a second language in Indonesian education system in both primary and secondary school. It is taught as a compulsory subject in junior high school (SMP) and senior high school (SMA), even it has been tried to be taught to the students in some elementary schools.
Teaching English in Indonesia is focused on the students’ communicative competence. The communication can be oral and written forms. The learners should be capable of using the four language skills, namely: listening, speaking, reading, and writing (National Department of Education, 2004: 6). Hymes stated that communicative competence is what a speaker needs to know in order to be communicatively competence in a speech community. In order to gain communicative competence, a student has to acquire not only knowledge but also ability of language use (Hymes in Richards et.al, 1986: 68). The learners should have abilities in reading and listening to support their speaking and writing.
Celce-Murcia represented the model of communicative competence (Murcia in Curriculum 2004). In her model, Murcia developed the competencies in order that the students can achieve communicative competence. The core of communicative competence is discourse competence. Discourse competence is the ability to understand and create forms of the language that are longer than sentences, such as stories, conversations, or business letters. Discourse competence concerns with selection, sequencing, and arrangement of words, structures, sentences and utterances to achieve a unified spoken or written text. It includes understanding how particular instances of language use are internally constructed. (Murcia in Curriculum 2004) Meanwhile, the students are able to acquire discourse competence only if they can gain the supported competencies namely linguistic competence, actional competence, sociocultural competence and strategic competence. Linguistic competence deals with sentence pattern and types, constituent structure, morphological inflection, lexical resources, and phonological systems needed to realize communication such as spoken and written. The actional competence relates with oral communication. It can be applied by the teacher in class in order that the students are familiar with English discourse. The sociocultural competence concerns with how to express message in the socio and cultural context. It is very important in learning second language because the students can not find the social and cultural context by themselves. The teacher needs to create a part or the entire language environment. (Brown, 2000: 7). Brown (2000: 7) stated that “Teaching is guiding and facilitating learning, enabling the learner to learn, setting the condition for learning”. The students learn to express, to interpret, and to negotiate meaning according to culturally-derived norms and expectations. Thus, the three components are accommodated with strategic competence. It is used to break down the problem and difficulties encounter in communication.  
Canale (1983) oulines four major components of communicative competence: grammatical competence, including knowledge of vocabulary, rules of words and sentence formation, linguistic semantics, pronunciation and spelling; sociolinguistic competence, including rules of appropriateness of both meanings (allowable messages) and grammatical forms in different sociolinguistic contexts; discourse competence, the knowledge required to combine forms and meanings to achieve unified spoken and written texts; and strategic competence, knowledge of verbal and and non-verbal communication strategies that may be called upon to compensate for limitations in one or more of the other areas of communicative competence (www. Wikipedia.com).
Writing is one of the important skills in teaching English. It has always occupied a place in most English language course. One of the reasons is that more and more people can explain how people perform different processes in a sequence of steps. To write well, people must have good capabilities in writing. Moreover, someone who wants to write a text s/he should know the steps in writing process and aspects of writing. The writer must be able to organize the idea, to construct a sentences, to use punctuation and spelling well. Besides, they must be able to arrange their writing into cohesive and coherent paragraphs and texts. Byrne (1997: 1) defines “Writing is producing sequence of sentences arranged in a particular order and linked together in certain ways”. In reality, people always communicate to each other. They do not only communicate with spoken language but also communicate in written language. It is one of the reasons why the people need to master writing-skill well.
Basically, in writing, learners are not only realizing information message or idea in a sentence in correct grammatical but also they must be packed in text formulation that conventionally have been agreed by the society. So that, the reader or audience will more easily understand the content in the texts. As for the criterion is; (1) purpose, (2) rhetorical structure, (3) linguistic realization or grammatical pattern (Pardiyono, 2007: 2). In other word, as consideration of the effectiveness of using language, each written text should include these.
Mastering writing skill is not easy. Problem may rise during studying writing. Trible (1996) says that learning writing skill is difficult. His statement is as follows,; “Learning to write in either a first or second language is one of the most difficult tasks a learner encounters. Many native speakers leave school with a poor command of writing. Learning to write is a difficult and lengthy process. One of that is induces anxiety and frustration in many learners. Learning to write is not just a question on developing a set of mechanical “orthographic skill”. It also involves learning a new set of cognitive and social relation.” (Tribble in Qatawech, 2009: Unplubished Journal).
When someone learns a foreign language, he often faces interference, where he/ she applies his/her mother tongue or first language structure to structure of the foreign language which is different from his/ her native language. Indonesian students learn English as the first foreign language. Therefore, English is a new language so that they get some difficulties and they also need much time to learn. Competence based curriculum 2004 claims, “………………. when one learns a foreign language, he is involved in creating and interpreting various kinds of texts made form the foreign culture which are different from his own.” Thus, kinds of texts which are colored by various communicative objectives, arrangement of parts of the text, and certain linguistics features should be noticed by every language learners. It means that the learners can not only create English sentences in isolation, but also arrange them to become texts that are accepted by the native speakers.
Moreover, Fauziati (2001) says that most of learning problems are caused by different elements found between the two languages. Therefore, he will be able to learn the elements of the target language which are similar to those with his own more easily than those which are not found in his native language. On the other hand, it is difficult for Indonesian to use correct structure in English. This is mostly because the students are influenced by their mother tongue on the acquisition of the new structure. However, the students are still weak in English, especially in their writing skill. They still seem to commit errors in all aspect of language. According to James (1998) in Saadiyah Darus, errors in writing such as tenses, prepositions and weak vocabulary are the most common and frequent type of errors that are committed by learners. The learners usually face difficulties in learning the grammatical aspects of the Target Language, such as in subject-verb agreement, the use of preposition, articles and the use of correct tense. Such errors can be seen clearly in the learners’ written performance (Nik Safiah (1978) in Darus 2009). The problems that the students are bound to encounter would be weak vocabulary, inappropriate use of grammar in sentence etc. teachers who can analyze and treat errors effectively would be more able to help their students to become more corrective techniques can give effective learning and teaching of English. In fact, making mistakes is a natural process of learning and must be considered as part of learning. As a result, errors must be viewed positively. Therefore, EA is the best tool for describing and explaining errors made by speakers of other languages. By investigating students’ written work, it will provide a means to help the teachers to recognize the importance of errors as one of the challenging areas in teaching English.
Interlanguage is a study on the language of the second language learners, which currently receives a wider acceptance in the literature of Error Analysis (Fauziati, 2009: 155). The notion ‘interlanguage’ means to “a language between two (or more) languages, i.e. a target language (Lt) norm which a student is trying to achieve, and his first language (L1). The interlanguage has charactheristics of both of these languages” (Ro, 2009). The recognition as systematic rules also comes from Smith (1994). He defines interlanguage as “the systematic linguistic behavior of learners of a second or other language; in other words; learners of non-native languages” (Smith, 1994: 7).
Due to the intricacy of writing, it is understandable that students usually fins difficulty in writing tasks. Commonly, they are afraid of making mistakes and worry about their ability in reproducing and arranging words of making mistakes and worry about their ability in reproducing in writing tasks, they do not want to try and even they do not like writing. It is teachers’ task to create an exciting and conducive writing class as well as to give continuous guidance to students. Teachers should try to explore new productive strategies in brightening the writing class. It is really a hand job, but students should be given a strong foundation for their writing skill before entering the higher level of education.  
Writing a short text will make students really enjoy the writing class. As learners know more about the language, many errors will disappear. Not only do the they replace one tense with the other tense(s), but also they fail to construct the correct verb forms for these tenses, for examples:
·     My former teacher was Mrs. Esti. I study with her for two year.
·     My teacher in class X was Mrs. Esti. I studyed with her during two years.
·     I have visit Borobudur many times, so I can tell you how it is like.
These errors were caused by the difference between the rules of the language used by the students (Indonesian) and the rules of target language. Although the writer admits that students, in their process of learning, usually cannot prevent themselves from making errors, she still thinks the errors made by the students need remedial work or otherwise they will remain errors.
Related to the phenomenon above, in this research the writer would like to conduct a research about "THE SISTEMATICITY OF INTERLANGUAGE OF THE SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS".
B.     Formulation of the Problem
Based on this problem, the problem is formulated as what is the writer rises some subsidiary research questions as follows;
1.      What is the linguistic system used by the students to express past events?
2.      What is the linguistic system used by the students to express future events? 
3.      What is the linguistic system used by the students to express present  events?
4.      What is the linguistic system used by the students to express negation.
C.    The Objectives of the Study
In relation to the background of the study and the problem formulation, there are some objectives that are expected to be achieved in this study. The objectives are as follows:
1.      to describe what the linguistic system used by the students to express past events is
2.      to describe what the linguistic system used by the students to express future events is
3.      to describe what the linguistic system used by the students to express present events is
4.      to describe what the linguistic system used by the students to express negation is
D. Limitation of the Study
Problem limitation is made in order to avoid misunderstanding and misinterpretation. It also hopefully can give a limitation toward the given analysis. The writer only focuses the study on the errors in English writing of class XI Accounting 1 students at SMK xxx, so that the study in writing texts will be improved.
In order the study can be deeply examined, the writer needs to limit the study as follows:
1. The  subjects of the study is limited to the secondary students of eleventh grade at SMK xxx  in the Academic Year 2010/2011. There were 34 female students in the class.
2.  The objects of the study is limited on the sistematicity of interlanguage and error analysis in English writing of class XI Accounting 1 students of SMK xxx.
E. The Benefits of the Study
Herewith, the author expects that this research would give several benefits, both theoretically and practically.
1. Theoretical Benefit
The finding of the research will be useful as a reference and comparison for the future research. This research is dealing with the sistematicity of interlanguage of the secondary school students in SMK xxx. 
2.  Practically Benefits
a.  For the teachers
1)      By reading the result of this study, they can get clear description about the common errors made by the students so they find new methods to anticipate the making of errors and to improve their teaching ability in English class especially in teaching writing.
2)      By investigating the students’ errors in their written works, it will provide help to the teachers to learn something about the effectiveness in their teaching English.
3)      The teachers also get clear explanation about the learning strategies that the students employ to master English.
b. For the readers: the study can serve as a reference for those who want to conduct a research dealing with error analysis and interlanguage.

Tesis: IMPROVING STUDENTS’ ENGLISH SPEAKING COMPETENCE THROUGH THINK-PAIR-SHARE STRATEGY (A Classroom Action Research on the Seventh Grade Students of SMP Negeri 1 xxxxxx Academic Year 2010/2011)

ABSTRACT
IMPROVING STUDENTS’ ENGLISH SPEAKING COMPETENCE THROUGH THINK-PAIR-SHARE STRATEGY (A Classroom Action Research on the Seventh Grade Students of SMP Negeri 1 xxx Academic Year 2010/2011). Thesis. 2011.
The problem of seventh grade students in SMPN 1 xxx was lack of speaking competence. It was caused by the lack of English speaking practice and less motivation of speaking. The objectives of the research were: 1) to find out whether the use of Think-Pair-Share in teaching English improve the students’ English speaking competence at the seventh grade in SMPN 1 xxx, 2) to find out the effectiveness of using Think-Pair-Share in teaching English speaking, and     3) to find out the problems that may appear during the application of Think-Pair-Share in speaking class.
The data were collected through observation and tests. They were collected through the students’ participation in speaking class. The observation was done in the students’ ability to do the exercises, join the group discussion and presentation. The data were supported by the informal interview after speaking class had finished.
The findings show that: 1) the use of TPS in speaking class can improve the students’ English speaking competence at the seventh grade in SMPN 1 xxx. 2) The use of TPS is effective in teaching speaking in terms of improving the students’ affective factors such as motivation and self confidence, arousing the students’ active participation during the speaking class, improving the students’ speaking competence, especially the speaking score. 3) The problems appeared during the application of TPS were a few students who still passive in speaking and those who still did not fulfill the Minimum Passing Grade or Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal (KKM).
The research findings implied that TPS can be an alternative strategy to promote the students’ speaking competence. Therefore, it is recommended that the English teacher apply it. It is also recommended that the institution socialize the findings since it is useful for English subject. The last is for other researchers to develop the aspect of speaking competence which has not been developed in the research.
Keywords: improving, speaking competence, Think-Pair-Share strategy

Tesis: Pendekatan Quantum Teaching Dengan Alat Peraga Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Matematika Materi Bangun Ruang Siswa Kelas VIII-A Semester 2 SMP Negeri XXXXX Tahun 2010/2011

ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk meningkatkan prestasi belajar matematika materi bangun ruang melalui metode quantum teaching.
Setting penelitian ini adalah SMP Negeri xxxx. Subjek penelitian adalah siswa kelas VIII-A SMP Negeri xxxxx semester 2 Tahun Pelajaran 2010/2011 yang berjumlah 30 siswa.
Metode penelitian menggunakan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui observasi, dokumentasi, dan tes. Analisis data dilakukan dengan tiga tahapan meliputi: reduksi data, penyajian data dan penarikan kesimpulan atau verifikasi.
Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa berdasarkan data empirik penelitian menyatakan bahwa melalui penggunaan Pendekatan Quantum Teaching dengan alat peraga dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar siswa kelas VIII-A SMP Negeri xxxxxxx Tahun 2010/2011 materi bangun ruang dari kondisi awal rata-rata 49.7 ke kondisi akhir rata-rata 62.3. Ketuntasan juga mengalami peningkatan dari 26.7% pada kondisi awal menjadi 86.7% pada kondisi akhir di siklus II. Jadi didapatkan kesimpulan bahwa melalui pendekatan quantum teaching dengan alat peraga dapat meningkatkan hasil belajar matematika materi bangun ruang siswa kelas VIII-A SMP Negeri xxxxx semester 2 tahun pelajaran 2010/2011.   
Kata kunci: prestasi belajar matematika, quantum teaching, bangun ruang

Sabtu, 27 Juli 2013

Mathematics Teaching Learning - Journal

Overview
This chapter focuses on advances in the study of mathematics teaching and learning since the publication of the first edition of the Handbook of Educational Psychology (Berliner & Calfee, editors) in 1996. Because of the scope of the review, comprehensive coverage is not possible. In what follows I have chosen to focus thematically on major areas in which progress has been made or where issues at the boundaries of theory and practice are controversial. These areas include: research focusing on issues of teacher knowledge and aspects of professional development; issues of curriculum development, implementation, and assessment; issues of equity and diversity; and issues of learning in context(s). The chapter concludes with a discussion of the state of the field and its contextual surround.

Teacher Knowledge
Significant progress has been made over the past decade in understanding mathematics teachers’ knowledge, how it plays out in practice, and how it can be developed. The field can boast of two major books and two additional programmatic bodies of work, all of which add significantly to our understanding. Over the past decade, two major works have emerged that expand the field’s conception of the nature and complexity of the knowledge that teachers bring to the classroom. Liping Ma’s 1999 book Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics demonstrated the unique character of highly accomplished mathematics teachers’ knowledge – a knowledge clearly different from knowledge of the mathematics alone. Magdalene Lampert’s
2001 book Teaching Problems and the Problem of Teaching offers a remarkably detailed empirical and theoretical examination of the multiple levels of knowledge, planning, and decision-making entailed in a year’s teaching. Next, I briefly describe Deborah Ball, Hyman Bass, and their colleagues’ studies of the mathematical knowledge that supports effective teaching, and the work of Miriam Sherin in describing teachers’ professional vision. Like the work described before it, this work sheds light on the character of knowledge that enables teachers to interact effectively with students over substantial mathematics. This work is followed by a description of the work by the Teacher Model Group at Berkeley, which has worked to characterize both the nature of teacher knowledge and the ways that it works in practice. Like the work of Ball, Bass, and colleagues, this work characterizes teaching as problem solving. It contributes to the problem solving and teaching literatures by describing, at a theoretical level of mechanism, the kinds of decision-making in which teachers engage as they work to solve the problems of teaching.

Rabu, 24 Juli 2013

Jasa Training; Bimbingan; Konsultasi dan Pembuatan PTK / PTS Solo dan sekitarnya (Surakarta; Karanganyar; Sukoharjo; Wonogiri; Sragen; Klaten; Boyolali; Purwodadi; Salatiga)

MEDIA ILMIAH - Pusat Olah Data dan Karya Tulis Ilmiah
Pabelan, Kartosuro
0888 2988 781 / 0888 4198 220
a/n : Andi / Lisa
media_ilmiah@ymail.com
Tim Media Ilmiah menawarkan program Training dan Pembuatan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK) / Penelitian Tindakan Kepengawasan / Sekolah (PTS) bagi Anda para guru; Kepala Sekolah dan Pengawas yang kesulitan dalam membuat/menyusun dan melaksanakan Penelitian Tindakan Kelas (PTK). Kami tidak sekedar mentraining Anda ataupun membuatkan PTK Anda, namun kami juga membimbing Anda secara teknis dalam pelaksanaannya. Mulai dari membuat Judul; membuat proposal; mencari referensi/literatur; mengenalkan metode pembelajaran terbaru; pelaksanaan tindakan dan penyusunan laporan PTK/PTS.
 
A.     TRAINING/WORKSHOP Penulisan Karya Ilmiah PTK/PTS
1.      Jumlah peserta : 5 – 15 orang/kelas.
2.  Training dilaksanakan 5 pertemuan (90menit/pertemuan) dengan langsung pada teknis pembuatan PTK. Pelaksanaan Training disesuaikan dengan progres pembuatan PTK peserta.
3.      Biaya : Rp 700ribu/pertemuan.
4.      Training dilaksanakan di kelas sekolah yang bersangkutan.
5.  Kelas Training bisa gabungan dari beberapa sekolah dengan lokasi berdekatan, jumlah peserta maksimal 15orang/kelas.
6.      Tahapan Training: JUDUL  + INSTRUMEN PENELITIAN ; PENDAHULUAN; BAB 1; BAB 2; BAB 3; BAB 4; BAB 5; LAMPIRAN KELENGKAPAN.
7.  Pada pertemuan terakhir ditargetkan semua peserta sudah menyelesaikan PTK lengkap dengan Lampiran kelengkapannya.
Training dilaksanakan dengan mengacu pada Buku Pedoman Penilaian Kegiatan PKB – Menilai Karya Ilmiah.


B.      PENYUSUNAN Karya Ilmiah PTK / PTS
Bagi Anda yang benar-benar kesulitan membuat/menyusun PTK/PTS karena kesibukan tugas & kegiatan lain, kami juga bersedia untuk membuat/menyusun PTK/PTS Anda sampai selesai dengan ketentuan:
1.    Data dari Anda guru peneliti.
2.    Biaya  Rp600ribu/PTK, dengan sistem pembayaran:
-  Uang muka = 60%, diserahkan bersamaan dengan data-data penelitian.
-   Pelunasan = 40% saat pengambilan berkas PTK / file PTK dikirim via email.
3.  Fasilitas yang Anda dapatkan : berkas PTK lengkap dengan Lampiran Kelengkapan dan CD berisi file PTK lengkap. Untuk klien Luar Kota & Luar Jawa: softfile dikirim via email.
Dalam menyusun laporan PTK/PTS, kami merujuk pada Buku Pedoman Penilaian Kegiatan PKB – Menilai Karya Ilmiah.
PERCAYAKAN PEMBUATAN KARYA ILMIAH ANDA KEPADA KAMI!!!
MEDIA ILMIAH
Pabelan, Kartosuro (selatan SDN Pabelan 2)
0888 4198 220 / 0888 2988 781

Jasa Pembuatan Tesis di Solo / Surakarta; Semarang; Yogyakarta / Jogja

Media Ilmiah
Pembuatan Tesis; Skripsi dan Karya Tulis Ilmiah
Hub: 0888 4198 220 / 0888 2988 781
a.n Andi / Lisa

Tesis merupakan tugas akhir yang dikerjakan dan disusun oleh mahasiswa tingkat pascasarjana (S-2) guna untuk mendapatkan gelar master di bidangnya. Dalam tesis tentu saja pokok permasalahan yang diangkat dikaji secara lebih mendalam daripada penulisan karya skripsi.

Tidak sedikit mahasiswa S-2 yang mengalami kesulitan dalam menyelesaikan tugas akhir tesis tersebut. Kendala yang dialami bisa saja seperti tema yang diangkat terlalu berat sehingga mahasiswa tersebut kesulitan dalam mengerjakan tulisannya, dapat juga data-data yang diperoleh sangat sulit atau memerlukan waktu yang lama atau kesulitan mencari referensi buku yang sesuai. Oleh karena itu kami hadir untuk membantu Anda mengatasi berbagai kendala yang menghambat penulisan tesis Bagi Anda para calon Magister yang sampai saat ini terkendala dalam membuat Tesis.

Kami sudah 5 tahun membantu para calon Sarjana dan calon Magister dalam menyelesaikan Karya Tulis Ilmiahnya. Dalam menyusun Skripsi dan Tesis kami menggunakan referensi yang mutakhir dan terkini, dengan didukung koleksi buku di perpustakaan kami yang cukup lengkap dan selalu update tiap minggu. Kami bukan plagiator / copy paste, karena Karya Tulis Ilmiah menyebut dengan jelas referensi (buku dan jurnal) yang dipakai.Kami menyusun Tesis mulai dari proposal Judul - Bab 1 - Bab 2 - Bab 3 - Bab 4 - Bab 5 sampai materi ujian presentasi - revisi setelah ujian dan kelengkapan berkas untuk mendaftarkan wisuda. Semua berkas dan soft file adalah milik Anda dan menjadi Hak Intelektual Anda.

Selesaikan Skripsi dan Tesis Anda bersama kami. Percayakan Karya Tulis Ilmiah Anda kepada kami.

Interlanguage Errors in English Textbooks for Junior High School Students in Surakarta

Endang Fauziati
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta

Abstract: The present study deals with the English textbooks for Junior High
School students. It is worth studying because they are marked with a
significant number of errors both in the area of vocabulary and grammar. This
research is to find proof that the English used is still at the level of
interlanguage (IL). Theories on Error Analysis (EA) and Interlanguage (IL)
have been used to analyze the data which consist of erroneous sentences taken
from the reading texts only. The result reveals that the English used in the
textbooks is still at the level of IL. The features of systematicity, permeability,
and fossilization of an interlanguage also existed in it.
Key words: interlanguage errors, English textbooks, junior high school
English textbooks for junior high school students are worth studying since they
have a great number of errors which include various linguistic items as well as
grammatical elements. Such errors suggest that the writers have not yet fully mastered
the rules of the language they have learnt. In general such errors are considered as "an
inevitable sign of human fallibility" (Corder, 1981:65), for example, as the consequence
of lack of attention or poor memory on the part of the learners or inadequacy of the
teachers' teaching. Anyhow, errors are inevitable in any learning situation, which
requires creativity such as in learning a second language. For text-book writers,
however, such errors cannot be admitted. They should not occur in English textbooks
from which the students learn English.
In 1976 Corder published a seminal article "The Significance of Learners Errors",
in which he proposed that the learner constructed his own version of the grammar of the
target language. The outgrowth of his ideas is labeled error analysis.. Errors, then, are
no longer viewed as mere deviations but rather as a source for studying the process used
by the learner in learning the target language. He stated that "Errors are evidence about
the nature of the process and of the rules used by the learner at a certain stage in the
course (1977: 167)." So if we want to study the learner's language systems, we should
find clues to the systems by analyzing the errors he commits.
Selinker (1977) proposes the term "interlanguage" to refer to the language system of
the second language learner, a system distinct from both the native as well as the target
language. His language system contains elements of both the first language as well as
the target language. Its sister terms are "Approximative System" (Nemser, 1977),
"Idiosyncratic Dialect" (Corder, 1977), and "Transitional Competence" (Dulay, Burt,
and Krashen, 1982). This "dialect" has the significant features usually attached to an IL,
namely systematicity, permeability, and fossilization (Adjemian, 1976).
The existing errors show that the textbook writers confront a lot of problems related
to vocabulary and grammar in their attempt to express the intended meaning in English.
Some words are retained in their native language, and others are literal translations that
result in errors because of the mismatching and the existence of superfluous
expressions. While the problems on the target language grammar have induced the
textbooks writers to commit a wide range of grammatical errors.
The purpose of the present study is two folds: to find the types of errors committed
by the textbook writers and to explain how and why those errors occur. This study has
yielded two important things. First, it gives us vivid pictures of the common
phenomenon which usually occur in foreign language learning. The answers to the
questions of what types of errors frequently occur, how and why the errors exist, have
led us to a deeper understanding of the process of second or foreign language learning.
Second, from a practical point of view, the findings have made us aware to reconsider
the use of such English textbooks for classroom resource materials. The fact shows that
in most foreign language instructions, teachers and students rely heavily on textbook
materials. Both teachers and students will make use of any textbooks most often
regardless of the quality. The findings of this study imply that nothing else is as
important to foreign language educators, especially in the junior high schools in
Surakarta, as having good, basic textbooks for their students.
REVIEW OF THE RELATED LITERATURE
Grauberg (1971) has conducted a study on errors committed by adult foreign
language learners. The corpus of his investigation is 193 German foreign language
errors. The result of his investigation indicates that errors resulted from first language
interference are only one of the types of errors found in syntax, morphology and
lexicon of the students' writing in the target language.
Burt (1977) has conducted a study on errors made by adult learners. She has tried
to find the types of errors which cause the listeners or readers to misunderstand the
message intended by the English foreign language learners. The findings show that
errors which significantly hinder communication, in the sense that they cause the
listener or reader to misunderstand the message or to consider the sentence
incomprehensible, are of certain type, while those that do not hinder communication
are of an-other type. Both types of errors are easily distinguishable.
Smithies and Holzknecht (1983) has conducted a study of written English errors
committed by the tertiary level students in Papua New Guinea. The result of their
analysis shows a wide range of error types, namely the articles (11.37%),. prepositions
(10.6%), verb (10.50%), noun (7.5%), and spelling, (7.4%).
Wode (1986) has also conducted a study on errors made by second language
learners. The findings show that transfer does occur in learners' language. Transfer is
developmental, i.e. it is an integral part of how people learn languages. The occurrence
of transfer is systematic.
THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
Several more in-depth studies which have given invaluable contributions to the
theories in EA. There are three basic stages in EA: recognition, description, and
explanation of errors.
The first stage in error analysis is recognition of errors. Among the many language
scholars whose works I have read, Corder (1978, 1981) is the only one who has
elaborated the procedure to detect errors. He suggests that errors can be detected by
comparing what the learner actually said with what he ought to have said to express
what he intended to ex-press. Thus, errors can be identified by comparing original
utterances with reconstructed utterances, that is, correct sentences having the meaning
in-tended by the learner.
Corder concludes that we have to consider the sentences produced by learners
based on two things: acceptability and appropriacy. Acceptability has something to do
with the language code (competence) and appropriacy with the proper use of the code
(performance). Sentences are, thus, erroneous if they are unacceptable or inappropriate.
However, a sentence may be unacceptable but appropriate, or acceptable but
inappropriate, or of course, both unacceptable and inappropriate. All of them are
considered erroneous. Only sentences which are both acceptable and appropriate, may
be free from errors, as seen in the tablel.
Table 1. Acceptability and Appropriacy of Sentences
acceptable appropriate free from error
acceptable inappropriate erroneous
unacceptable appropriate erroneous
unacceptable inappropriate erroneous
The second stage deals with classification of errors. Corder simply comments that
errors can be classified through a comparison process between the data being the
original erroneous utterance and the constructed one, that is the process similar to that
of contrastive analysis. He seems to have focused exclusively on one alternative for
classifying errors, i.e. error types in terms of linguistic categories.
Dulay, Burt, and Krashen (1982), however have presented a more complete work
on error classification, comparing with that of Corder. They propose several alternatives
for error classification. They classify errors in terms of (1) linguistic categories, (2)
surface strategy taxonomy, (3) comparative taxonomy, and (4) communicative effect
taxonomy (see Dulay, Burt, and Krashen, 1982: 146).
The final stage is explanation of errors. First, Jain (1977) highlights on L1
independent errors. There are several factors causing LI independent errors, such as
learning strategies, teaching techniques, folklore about L2 (second language), and the
age of bilingualism. The latter means the period over which the L2 has been used by the
speech community to which the learner belongs.
Stenson (1980) has been attracted to observe errors that correlate with the teaching
techniques. If a learner is taking part in formal interaction, some errors will be a direct
result of misunderstanding caused by faulty teaching or materials. She gives the term
"induced errors", while Selinker (1977) called it "transfer of training errors".
In his works Selinker (1977, 1988) has presented a comprehensive discussion on
this matter. He correlates the issues of the sources of errors with the second language
learning process. He even proposes a special term to refer to the language system of the
second language learner, that is IL.
He has argued that IL is resulted from the learner's attempts to pro-duce the target
language norms. In other words, it is the product of the second language learning
processes. The five processes he describes are in terms of: (1) Language Transfer, (2)
Transfer of Training, (3) Strategies of Second Language Learning, (4) Strategies of
Second Language Communication, and (5) Ovcrgeneralization of the Target Language
Linguistic Materials.
Adjemian (1976) refines the IL hypothesis and singles out a number of important
characteristics of IL: syatematicity, permeability, and fossilization.
Systematicity follows from the hypothesis that IL are natural languages. This
means that an IL can not be a random collection of entities. It is, however, assumed to
be systematic from the start. Like any natural language system, IL seems to obey
universal linguistic constrains.
The second property of IL is permeability of the developing gram-mar. It refers to
"the susceptibility of IL to infiltration by first language and target language rules or
forms" (Yip, 1995:12). It is in accord with the statement given by Adjemian (1976:21)
that "IL systems are dynamic in character. The systems are thought to be by their nature
incomplete and in the state of flux." The structures of the IL can be invaded or
infiltrated by the L1 of the learner.
The third property of IL is fossilization. It is "the persistence of plateaus of nontarget
like competence in the interlanguage" (Selinker, 1988:92). When its permeability
is lost, the features of an IL become subject to fossilization. A learner is expected to
progress further along the learning continuum, so that his competence moves closer and
closer to the target language system and contains fewer and fewer errors. Some errors,
however, never disappear for good.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The present study is based on a library research in which the data consist of
erroneous sentences taken from seven English textbooks for Junior High School
Students. To limit this study, I have collected the erroneous sentences from the reading
texts in those textbooks only. There are 225 erroneous sentences that can be
accumulated. They are listed and used as the data.
The data analysis has been carried out through the following steps. First, the
accumulated data are classfied in terms of linguistic categories and comparative
taxonomy. Second, each type of errors is calculated to find out the total number and
frequency of each type of errors. Finally, the sources or causes of errors arc discussed.
DATA ANALYSIS
The analysis of the data is presented in two major parts. The first part deals with
vocabulary and the second grammar.
ERRORS ON VOCABULARY
The data show a significant number of errors on vocabulary which include (1)
misuse of vocabulary or special expression that can be traced back to the textbook
writers' first language (L I) and (2) use of wrong vocabulary that cannot be traced back
to their first language. The former involves (1) the use of Indonesian lexical items, (2)
the mismatch of lexical system between Indonesian as the native language and English
as the second language, (3) the superfluous expression, and (4) the modified in:
(1) The wayang kulit performance needs a screen, [...].
(2) It rained day after day, the weather felt cold.
cuaca terasa
(3) According to your opinion, how people here live?
Menurut pendapatmu
(4) We classify them as furniture, clothes [... ]electronika and vehicles.
elektronika
Next, vocabulary that cannot be traced back to their L1 covers (1) the misuse of
vocabulary because of the similarity in form, (2) the misuse of vocabulary because the
similarity in meaning, and (3) the occurrence of wordiness such as in:
(1) [...] to the stationary and bought school utensils.
stationery
(2) They are also interested in. following sport [...].
taking part
(3) Mr. Lukman is old, [ ... ]he is retired on a pension.
retired/pension
ERRORS ON GRAMMAR
The analysis shows a wide range of error linguistic categories which include (1)
tenses, (2) affixation, (3) preposition, (4) article, (5) pronoun, (6) conjunction, (7)
omission of object, (8) clause redundancy, (9) passive voice, (10) adjunct, modifier,
and quantifier, and (11) parallel construction. There are very few errors which only
emerge once throughout the texts studied; they are categorized as (12) miscellaneous
errors.
(1) [... ] we may imagine as if we arc in a big city. were
(2) Violations against the rules should be punished. Violators
(3) Most women are skilled in weaving pandan mats. skillful
(4) We have English teacher niathematic teacher [... ]. mathematics
(5) If they obey the rules because they are afraid to the punishment [... ].
of
(6) Mr. Sutomo said "thank for God".
thank God
(7) So we are at school about six and half hours. for about
(8) ... J 1 like to read the books in the library. books
(9) People in Jakarta are very busy, so wgcan't [... ]. they
(10) My mother loves gardening, on the other hand my sister likes
' and/whereas reading very much.
(11) The clever cat will catch easily but [... J. catch the rat
(12) Mother wakes up early before every one wakes up.
wakes up early before every one else
(13) Thefestival was taken part by popular dancers.
Popular dancers took part in the festival.
(14) The Indonesian government's campaign topopularize
Bahasa Indonesia at present can L.].
At present, the Indonesian government ' s campaign to
popularize Indonesian Language
(15) Then Indonesia produces a lot of products for domestic use
as well as to be exported. domestic use as well as for export
(16) They bought a wool trousers, a cotton { ... ]. a pair of
woolen trousers
ERROR CLASSIFICATION BASED ON COMPARATIVE TAXONOMY
Classification of errors in a comparative taxonomy is based on `"comparison
between the structure of second language errors and certain other types of construction"
(Dulay, Burt, and Krashen 1982). In this study, the writer compares the textbook
writers' errors in English with their Indonesian equivalents. This comparison has yielded
three major categories in this taxonomy: (I) interlingual errors, (2) developmental
errors, and (3) others.
Table 1. Classification of Errors
Comparative
taxonomy
No. Linguistic Category Taxonomy
Vocabulary/
Grammar Inter
Lingu
al
Develop
mental
Othe
r
L Vocabulary that can be traced to Li
1 Indo. Words/Phrases 37 - , -
2 Mismatch of Lexical System 24 - -
3 Superfluous Expression 5 - -
4 Modified Indonesian words 4 -
IL Vocabulary that cannot be traced
to Ll
5 Similarity in Form - 4 -
6 Similarity in Meaning - 29 -
7 Wordiness - _ 11 -
III. Grammar
1 Tenses - 2 1
2 Affixation
7
- 6 3
3 Preposition
Wrong Preposition 3 13 -
Addition of Preposition 1 3 -
Omission of Preposition 1 3 -
4 Article
Addition of Article - 5 -
Omission of Article 3 - -
5 Pronoun 4 4 -
6 Conjunction
Wrong Conjunction 6 1 -
Addition of Conjunction 6 1 -
7 Object 5 -
8 Redundancy 5 4 2
9 Passive Voice 16 -
_
-
10 Adjunct and Modifier - 4 _ 1 -
11 Parallel Construction - 5 -
12 Miscellaneous 3 - -
Total 122 97 6
FREQUENCY OF ERRORS
The analysis shows a wider range of error categories. This means that the
percentage varies. The highest percentage is recorded for vocabulary (50.52%) which
includes the use of Indonesian words and abbreviations (16.45%), the mismatch of
lexical system (10.67%), superfluous expressions (2.22%), use of Indonesian words
which are slightly modified (1.78%), false friends in form (1.78%), false friends which
are similar in meaning (12.89%), and wordiness (4.89%).
The next most significant errors are recorded for preposition (10.67), passive voice
(7.11%), conjunction (6.23%), redundancy (4.89%), affixation, pronoun, and article
(3.56%). The next highest percentage is adjunct and modifier (2.22%), object (2.22%),
parallel construction (2.22%), tenses (1.34%) and errors which are categorized as
miscellaneous (1.34%).
Table 2. Frequency of Errors
Linguistic
Category
(Vocabulary &
Grammar)
Interlingu
al
Develo
pmenta
l
Other
s
sum
Vocabulary
Indo. Words/Phrases 37 - - 37 16.45
Mismatch of Lexical
System
24 - - 24 10.67
Superfluous Expression 5 - - 5 2.22
Modified Indonesian
words
4 - - 4 1.78
Similarity in Form - 4 - 4 1.78
Similarity in meaning - 30 - 29 12.89
Wordiness - 11 - 11 4.89
Grammar
Preposition 1 23 - 24 10.67
Passive Voice 16 - - 16 7.11
Conjunction 13 1 - 14 6.23
Redundancy 5 4 2 11 4.89
Affixation - 6 3 9 4
Pronoun 4 4 - 8 3.56
Article 3 5 - 8 3.56
Adjunct and Modifier 4 - - 4 1.7
Object 5 - - 5 2.22
Parallel Construction - 5 - 5 2.22
Tenses - 2 1 3 1.34
Miscellaneous 3 - - 3 1.34
Total 122 97
_
6 225 100%
Having described the errors linguistically, I will proceed to present the sources of
errors. This activity involves both the fields of linguistics and psycholinguistics
(Corder, 1981). This would state the way in which the textbook writers deviate from
the rules of the target language, and why they disregard or break the rules.
In general, the errors seem to have three main characteristics. First, there are
errors which bear a strong resemblance to the characteristics of the L1. The second
denotes errors which resemble to the TL. Finally, there are very few errors which
resemble to neither L1 nor TL. The three phenomena have led me to conclude that the
are triggered by four major sources: (1) strategy of L2 communication, (2) language
transfer, (3) overgeneralization of TL linguistic materials, and (4) psychological and
external pressure. Consider these examples.
(1) The wayang kulit performance needs, I...] (Code switch
to L l)
(2) LI: Menurut pendapatmu bagaimana orang-orang [... ]
IL: According to your opinion how do people [ ... ]?
(3) IL: L.] besides that he does not need [... ].
L2: [ ... ] beside that he does not need [ ... ].
(4) Everyone should sport to make our body healthy.
In conclusion, the sources or causes of errors made by the textbook writers in this
study can be summarized below. First, errors that reflect the rules, forms, or vocabulary
item of the textbook writers' first language, might be triggered by several factors such
as:
1. They are forced to communicate things beyond their target language mastery
(external pressure);
2. They consciously use strategy of word-for-word translation; They switch into their
native language in either unmodified or slightly modified in order to be able to
covey cultural-bound ideas (communicative strategy);
3. They try to reduce their learning burden by relying themselves to
what they have already known, mother tongue, (transfer strategy) and
4. They use over extension of analogy that they misuse vocabulary
items which share semantic feature.
Second, errors which cannot be traced back to their first language might have been
resulted from the following factors:
1. It is obvious that the textbook writers' linguistic knowledge of the TL is in sufficient;
2. The acquired vocabulary and grammatical rules are quite limited;
3. In coping with the inherent complexity of the target language, they rely on what
they have already known about the TL (overgeneralization);
4. They incompletely apply the rules of the TL they have already mastered;
5. They are careless especially when writing long and complex sentences; and
6. They seem to be forced to express meanings beyond their linguistic knowledge.
CONCLUSION
In this investigation, I have accumulated 225 sentences containing errors. In terms
of linguistic categories, there are two major linguistic elements affected by errors:
vocabulary and grammar. Vocabulary errors, which include seven categories, constitute
the major errors found throughout the texts (50,52%). Grammatical errors include
twelve different categories with various percentages. The highest percentage has been
recorded for preposition (10.67%) and the lowest is for partitive (0.45%), (see
miscellaneous errors).
Next, based on comparative taxonomy, the errors can be classified into three major
classifications. The constructions which resemble to the first language are grouped into
interlingual errors (54.22%). Other constructions, having similar characteristics to the
target language (English), are categorized as developmental errors (43.12%). Finally,
the constructions which do not resemble to both the first language as well as the target
language are categorized as others (2.66%).
The present study has also presented the logical explanations of the sources of the
errors. They are explainable through the underlying strategies the textbook writers have
utilized when they learned the language. The analysis has revealed that there are
basically four sources of errors: strategy of second language communication, language
transfer, overgeneralization, and psychological and external pressure.
In essence, I can draw a conclusion that (1) the textbook writers have been most
confronted with problems on vocabulary, especially in finding adequate equivalents for
the key words. (2) They certainly have got difficulties in translating Indonesian
cultural-bound words into English. In addition, they did not notice several words which
seemed to be adequate equivalents but turned out to ae false friends. And to make
things worst, they have got inadequate capability in translation skills that they use literal
translation when expressing the intended meanings. (3) The writers' language
system is neither that of first nor the target language. Their language system contains
elements of both the L 1 and TL, it is still at the particular level similar to that of the
learners. Using Selinker's term, it is a fossilized interlanguage with three major
features: systematicity, permeability, and fossilization.
REFERENCES
Adjemian, C. 1976. On the Nature of Interlanguage System. Language Learning. 26:
297-320.
Burt, K. 1977. Error Analysis in the Adult EFL Classroom. In James E. Alatis Ruth
Crymes (eds.) 1977 46--56.
Corder. S.P. 1977. The Significance of Learners Errors. In Jack C. Richards (ed.) 1977.
Interlanguage 19--30.
Corder. S.P. 1978. Error Analysis, Interlanguage and Second Language Acquisition. In
Valerie Kinsella, (Ed.): Language Testing and Linguistics: Surveys. Cambridge:
CUP 1978: 60-75.
Corder. S.P. 1981. Error Analysis and Interlanguage. London: Oxford University
Press.
Dulay, H. Burt and Krashen. 1982. Language Two. New York: Oxford University
Press.
Grauberg, W. 1971. An Error Analysis in German of First-Year University Stu-dents.
In G. Parren and J. Trim (Eds.) 1971: 257--263.
Jam, M.P. 1977. Error Analysis: Source, Cause, and Significance. In Jack C. Richards,
(Ed.) 1977: 189--215.
Nemser. 1977. Approximative. System of Foreign Language Learners Perspectives on
Second Language Acquisition. In Jack C. Richards (Ed.) 1977: 55--63.
Richards, Jack C. 1977. A Non Contrastive Approach to Error Analysis. In Jack C.
Richards (Ed.) 1977. London: Longman Group 172--188.
Selinker, L. 1977. Interlanguage. In Jack C. Richards (Ed.) Perspectives on Second
Language Acquisition. 1977: 31--54.
Selinker, L. 1988. Papers in Interlanguage. Occasional Papers No. 44. Singapore:
SEAMEO Regional Language Center.
Smithies, and Holzknecht. 1983. Errors in Papua New Guinea Written English at the
Tertiary Level. RELC Journal 12.2:10--38.
Stenson. 1980. Induced Errors. In Croft, Kenneth (Ed.)1980: 54--69.
Wode, H. 1986. Language Transfer A Cognitive Functional and Development
View. In Kellerman, E. and Sharwood Smith, M. (Eds.) Crosslinguistics Influence
in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford; Oxford Pergamon.
Yip, Virginia. 1995. Interlanguage and learnability from Chinese to English.
Amsterdam: John Benjamin B.V.